Join Urban Deva on Facebook Join Urban Deva on Facebook

August 20, 2012

The Great Round of Transformation

The Great Round of Transformation

By Thea Euryphaessa

When I started out life coaching ten years ago and sat down in front of my first real-life client, I was immediately struck by how little I really knew about personal transformation ― it’s one thing wanting to help others change their lives; it’s quite another to traverse that precarious trajectory yourself, razing your life to the ground and turning your psyche inside-out so you can sort through the, often gory, frequently baffling viscera.

The enormity of what I was attempting hit me with a resounding humility. No matter how much I wanted to help, no matter how hard I’d studied, how many books I’d read, I knew I didn’t have the depth of experience to hold up against the weight of my clients’ hopes and fears. Not that I could change their lives for them ― I’ve never professed to be able to do that for anyone, nor would I ever. If you want to change any aspect of your life only you can do it, only for yourself, and only when you’re ready.

But it was this sense of inadequacy that eventually drove me to seek an inside-out, bottom-up transformation in my own life ― a cycle of growth which, ten years on, is still very much ongoing. Some days I wonder why the hell I ever started. But, in a way, I’m glad I feel like that; because that’s the reality of consciously committing to personal growth ― it’s damn hard work. Navigating my own ongoing voyage of self-discovery has lent me a more realistic, more compassionate, more patient insight into just what it takes to fulfil your potential and ‘live your essence out’ in a world that often feels as though it’s attempting to thwart you at every turn.

What has helped, though, is constantly observing, recording, and reflecting not just on my life, but on the lives of others who are either being dragged, or walking as best they can, from one life level to another ― hopefully one that’s more conscious, more vital, and more fulfilling. It’s these observations, along with my personal experience and ongoing studies, that have helped me identify the real life archetype of the Hero’s Journey: an initiatory cycle of transformation consisting of three main stages ― Separation, Initiation (or Ordeal), and Return or Life, Death, Rebirth ― that both threads through and circumscribes every metamorphosis that’s ever been.

I say ‘real life’ as when I first encountered Joseph Campbell’s book The Hero With a Thousand Faces, I thought this archetype was reserved for other people, ‘out there’, on the cinema screen, say; exceptional individuals whose stories have been laid down in the annals of myth, weaved into legends we modern mortals could only ever hope to aspire to. But it turns out that’s not the case at all.

What I’ve gradually come to understand is this is a living, breathing, dynamic archetype that becomes increasingly tangible the further you follow it, with each stage emerging and crystallising through the events and circumstances of one’s life. But it’s only with time and ongoing reflection that you begin to feel its outline, behold the shadow it casts.

At the end of my first book, Running into Myself, I was aware I still faced the third and final stage of this great round of transformation ― the Return. I intuited it’d be tough and said as much in the closing chapter. What I didn’t know was just how tough the final stage would be or how long it would last.

I’m a spirited, steadfast so-and-so, underscored by a strength that, at times, has surprised even me. But these past three-and-three-quarter years (my book ends in January 2009) have proved the most challenging of the last ten years by far. It was one thing being forged in the fiery physicality of three gruelling Marathons; it’s been quite another to be psychically dismembered, endure long periods without so much as a pot to piss in or a window to throw it out of, and make what’s seemed like sacrifice after heartbreaking sacrifice across all areas of my life. No wonder those familiar with the archetype of the Hero’s Journey remark on the Return phase as being the most difficult, the stage where most throw in the towel and slide back down the proverbial snake to square one ― they weren’t kidding.

No wonder they call it the Hero’s Journey.

Click here to read Part Two

:::

To buy a copy of Running into Myself, visit Amazon UKAmazon US or, better still, order a limited edition signed copy direct from her publisher here (also ships worldwide). Also available to download on Kindle.

Thea’s personal journey is utterly compelling. I couldn’t put her book down. Thea manages to make Greek mythology not only understandable, interesting, and relevant to our lives today, but shows how it can be utilised as a tool for self development. She introduces ideas and ways of thinking that broaden your mind, and lights the way for others to follow.”

— Melinda Messenger (TV Presenter)

“This is a story that truly reveals its author. You’ll discover her beliefs, her flaws, her loves, her fears, her mistakes, her drive and her compassion.

And you’ll like her.”

— Rowena Roberts (Writer)

February 5, 2012

Book Review: Gods in Everyman by Dr Jean Shinoda Bolen

Book Review:

Gods in Everyman by Dr Jean Shinoda Bolen

Well, we’ve dealt with the female deities, so it seems only fair that we move on to the male.

Not that this book is exclusively for men, any more than Goddesses in Everywoman was exclusively for women. As Bolen herself puts it in her preface:

‘When I speak about gods in Everyman [sic], I discover that women often find that a particular god exists in them as well, just as I found that when I spoke about goddesses men could identify a part of themselves with a specific goddess. Gods and goddesses represent different qualities in the human psyche. The pantheon of Greek deities together, male and female, exist as archetypes in us all, although the gods are usually the strongest and most influential determinants of a man’s personality, as the goddesses are for women.’

Gods in Everyman: Archetypes That Shape Men’s Lives was published in 1989, four years after Jean’s book on goddesses. If you’ve read the latter ― or at least read my review on it ― you’ll recognise in the former the same psychological device of using myths that have endured over centuries to express and understand archetypes: patterns of behaviour that are common to all humans.

In the sequel, men (and women) are encouraged to explore different aspects of their personalities represented by several god figures: Zeus, the powerful, ruthless patriarch; intense Poseidon, ruled by turbulent waves of emotion; Hades, the mysterious introvert whose still waters run infinitely deep; the favoured son Apollo, logical, self-motivated and emotionally distant; charming, eloquent Hermes, the spontaneous adventurer and trickster; passionate Ares, the fierce lover and fighter; soulful Hephaestus, the absorbed, wounded creator; and Dionysus, the attractive, sensual ecstatic, ruled by intense instinctive highs and lows.

Through such knowledge, Bolen’s readers may again find greater control over unconscious patterns of behaviour hidden within themselves via various ‘Aha!’ moments of self-recognition.

I’ve enjoyed the insights both fully gleaned and half-spied in both of Bolen’s books on this fascinating subject, and know that I shall return to them time and time again for further psychological insight at future times of need, or simple curiosity.

But, while reading Gods, an unexpected ‘Aha!’ moment came that wasn’t a realisation about my personality, or someone else’s character, but concerned something broader about society that has niggled at me for years.

For, while I like to think of myself as an independent and enlightened woman, ready to stand up for my position and that of others against negative cultural and sexual stereotyping, I’ve always steered clear of labelling myself a feminist. Perhaps I missed the main drive of the movement, having been privileged enough not to have had to personally fight for my political rights as I grew up. Perhaps it’s in my Persephone nature to sit on the fence, to argue both sides, to withdraw from outright commitment, to live in the world of grey rather than choose to be black or white.

But, then again, perhaps it’s because I hate debates where some people seem to automatically polarise everyone into one camp or another, solely by virtue of their gender. Perhaps I feel the frustration of men who say, ‘But we’re not all like that.’ Perhaps I felt, but never had the right words to express what Jean says so simply:

‘In a patriarchal society, women do not fare well. But male stereotypes also hold power over men, limiting who they can comfortably be by rewarding some qualities and rejecting others.’

Perhaps this is a remarkably facile revelation to have. But then, isn’t that the beauty of revelation? When something that’s been churning around in the white noise of your brain for years suddenly clicks into place, shudders into focus as the right words reverberate in your head for the first time and you realise that this, for you, is the simple truth that you’ve sensed all along.

Sure, my moments of ‘Aha’ won’t ring true for everyone. But then, if Jean Shinoda Bolen’s books tell us anything, it’s that we’re all different. Even though, united in the enduring archetypes of humanity, we’re also fundamentally the same.

Rowena Roberts

:::

UD:BOOKS

Urban Deva loves books. In fact, we’d go as far to say we’re obsessed. So we thought it’d be a good idea to share the love and regularly recommend some of our favourites. We hope you enjoy them too.

October 19, 2011

Book Review: Goddesses in Everywoman by Dr Jean Shinoda Bolen

Book Review:

Goddesses in Everywoman by Dr Jean Shinoda Bolen

I picked this book up because I believe in the power of stories.

As a lifelong bookworm, I know their power to fire the imagination and feed me awareness and understanding of people and worlds beyond my own experience. As an advertising copywriter, I also know their power to help brands gain customers’ interest, loyalty and (yes) cash ― and perhaps create a more imaginative, creative, and stimulating working environment for their employees.

But the notion that certain stories, when properly analysed and applied, could have the power to help me better understand, handle, and help my self? Now, this was intriguing.

Goddesses in Everywoman: Powerful Archetypes in Women’s Lives explains complex theories of Jungian depth psychology in simple terms that the layman (or woman) can understand. At its core, it is a book about archetypes, which ― according to Carl Jung ― are innate psychic dispositions that can influence and explain universal patterns of behaviour, common to all humans. Such patterns are usually hidden within the unconscious; only by recognising them consciously via some kind of psychological breakthrough can we understand motivations and habits that influence us, and perhaps keep us trapped in a certain cycle of behaviour.

The author, Dr Jean Shinoda Bolen, discovered during her work as a psychiatrist and analyst that using figures from Greek mythology to personify these archetypes helped some of her clients achieve this moment of breakthrough ― or “Aha!” as she terms it ― when what was unconscious becomes conscious and can therefore be tackled.

Her straightforward analysis of myths that have endured over thousands of years reveals patterns of behaviour and character traits that we can still recognise, identify with, and learn from today, realising as we do the eternal truth that we are human, and therefore we are not alone in what we feel.

Bolen’s approach may be simple, but her analysis is far from simplistic. Each goddess analysed in the book is a pattern, not a personality; the author explains how an individual may contain many goddesses, some of which may dominate ― or ‘become active’ ― during different life phases, events, even times of the month.

Bolen also challenges traditional Jungian thought that polarised archetypes into masculine and feminine attributes, which were often regarded as out of place in the opposite sex. Bolen’s approach is more holistic and less stereotypical, seeing goddesses ― and indeed gods ― in both women and men.

I experienced many moments of “Aha!” during the course of this book. For there, entwined in the myths of Athena, was my grandmother: practical, efficient, keen on crafts and good with her hands, but not so good with her heart; a critical and disappointed mother who focused on failure rather than nurture. And there was my closest school-friend, a classic Demeter-type whose desire to be a mother was already deep-rooted when we first met, at the age of 11. There was my Artemis great-aunt, independent of spirit, protector of the young, traveller, and lover of just causes.

And, of course, there was me in my 20s, stuck in the cycle of eager-to-please, quick-to-deceive Persephone, swept up by the desires of others, rather than her own, so greatly did she fear disapproval and dislike. That was a pattern that took me a while to acknowledge, and try to overcome.

Still, this is not a book that wags the finger accusingly; rather, it seeks to give the reader hope. For among our ‘goddess-given liabilities’ also lie ‘goddess-given gifts’, which we can discover and nurture, and even use to challenge society’s stereotypes from a point of inner certainty and truth ― stereotypes that might otherwise stop us from being the best we can be.

In this way, Bolen believes our inner goddesses can help us to live our own personal myths, empowering us with “the possibilities of finding personal meaning through choices others might not encourage.”

I could quote this book all day. But then you might not read it for yourself. And you really should, if you have any interest at all in discovering more about yourself and about others, female and male.

It’s an interesting story, after all; one that continues to endure across thousands of years: the story of humanity.

Rowena Roberts

:::

UD:BOOKS

Urban Deva loves books. In fact, we’d go as far to say we’re obsessed. So we thought it’d be a good idea to share the love and regularly recommend some of our favourite books.

We’d also like to take this opportunity to thank Rowena Roberts for doing such a stellar job of our first official book review, and look forward to sharing more of her thought-provoking finds with you.

April 5, 2011

The Greatest Love Of All

Before I continue, I’d like to apologise for the disjointed nature of this blog. I have things I want to record, remember. My next book is constellating and the thoughts shared here will have a part to play in it.

The Greatest Love Of All

A couple of weeks ago, while walking through Manchester city centre, I was stopped dead in my tracks by the above advert emblazoned across a billboard. My mouth gaped open. Is that the ideal our society is now peddling as womanhood?

Now, images like this are nothing new in this day and age. What galled me about this particular advert, however, was its cringe-worthy attempt at depicting an alluring, mysterious form of women’s sexuality. No disrespect to the model but she looks like a pre-pubescent girl who’s just raided mummy’s make-up case and is now parading about in her nightie.

I was raised in a house where images of the naked female form adorned most every wall: images by Toulouse-Lautrec, Schiele, and Picasso to name but a few. No-one, in my not-so-humble opinion, got closer to capturing the dark alluring underworld of female sexuality quite like Toulouse-Lautrec’s late 19th century Parisian depictions — life splayed open in all its indecent and decadent glory.

Growing up, I was somewhat shielded from our culture’s parochial, myopic ideas of female beauty by my parents’ interests. From mum I inherit my studious love for words and books, and from my aunt I inherited my passion for the female form, art in all its guises, and interior design — beauty, beauty, beauty. My aunt also used to play George Benson’s song The Greatest Love Of All over and over — she later told me she played it for me in the hope it might sink  into my unconscious. They never bought fashion glossies or gossip magazines into the house, preferring instead Ideal Homes, Private Eye, The Economist, and The Manchester Guardian newspaper (RIP).

Anyway, as some of you know, I recently attended a women’s only Tantra workshop. Life-changing stuff. A month on and I’m still reeling from it. Complementing perfectly my ongoing studies into archetypal psychology (which itself is derived from Jung’s Analytical Psychology), it balances head with body; the intellect with the experiential. So when I saw the above advert, it immediately called to mind the following excerpt from a book I recently read by Ginette Paris entitled Pagan Meditations:

Insisting on the beauty of Aphrodite, as one inevitably does, we risk forgetting that her mysteries are concerned with the whole body and not only with the eye. The woman who has the qualities of Aphrodite knows how to move, breathe, and vibrate, and is capable of generating as well as receiving high-intensity sexual energy.

Some beautiful women give the impression that they are inhabited by Aphrodite’s qualities. Their seductive appearance which promises of pleasure, however, leads to deception each time this promise is not kept by the body.

But when competence at bodily love prevails over good looks, certain women, even though unsightly, may exert upon their lovers an extraordinary attraction.

Several years ago, while travelling in Morocco, I went to see two performances of belly dancing in the same evening. The first took place in an American hotel, where I had gone to meet some friends. The publicity insisted upon the splendid figure of the dancer: she wore a light veil embroidered with pearls and was indeed beautiful. She moved little, but with grace. Her gestures were those of the belly-dance, but perhaps because of the air-conditioning, or her bleached blonde hair, the whole thing appeared to be insipid and deceptive [my italics].

Later in the evening, in the public square of the old town, I watched a young Berber woman dancing. She was certainly very poor and had no chance of penetrating show-business; her figure was too heavy, and her features hard and imperfect. Although dressed to the neck in a poor cotton dress, and without any artifice of scenery, she kept the public under the spell of her dance with the brusque movements of her hips, her rhythmic cries, her vigour, and her delighted eyes. All her muscles, all her gestures expressed what is most sexual within us. Each movement proceeded from her belly as if from the centre of herself. I have never since seen a more erotic dance.

The first dancer, although beautiful and graceful, seemed to imitate the movements of love, but she could not radiate with Aphrodite’s energy. It was only upon seeing the ‘real’ belly dancing that I knew the first was only a pastiche.

Insipid and deceptive. Bingo. And that’s exactly the perspective those of us on the Sapphic or Tantric path view posters such as the above. Thing is, it takes a hell of a lot of (conscious) physical and psychological work to break free from the myriad forms of body fascism that so insidiously grip our modern western culture, affecting the lives of both men and women.

Just last Saturday night, I inadvertently ended up doing a ritual which turned out to be quite profound. With my boyfriend out for the night, I turned our bathroom into a temple fit for a modern-day goddess. With dozens of fragrant candles dotted about the place, I scattered the entire bathroom floor with hot-pink rose petals, filled the bath with fragrant rose oil, and put some beautiful music on. I then spent the next few hours mindfully caring for and befriending my body. But it’s what happened at the end which most surprised me.

After drying off I slowly began to massage my favourite oil into my calves and thighs, while saying the following which is adapted from an exercise in Margot Anand’s brilliant book The Art of Everyday Ecstasy — The Seven Tantric Keys for Bringing Passion, Spirit, and Joy into Every Part of Your Life:

Thank you (legs) for carrying my weight in the world and supporting my life. Thank you (knees) for your unique mobility. Without you I could not walk, run, dance, do Pilates or Yin yoga, and a thousand other joys. Thank you (thighs) for your strength, for your willingness to be pillars of support to connect my pelvis to my legs. You are a great help to me. I’m sorry I’ve beat up on you every day with scorn and self-loathing because I didn’t believe you were sylph-like and slinky enough…

I then spent the next ten or fifteen minutes, quietly, tenderly massaging the oil into my thighs. As I massaged they began to feel sore and somewhat bruised — as though they were releasing long repressed pain and ancient hurt. If a body part could cry — and I believe they do — then my thighs did just that. And, as they did, I soothed and smoothed them lovingly as though holding a child or loved one who was in pain. For the first time in my life, I held and stroked them with love — unconditional love and absolute acceptance for how they were right now; not how they could be sometime in the future, but right now, in this moment. I told them it was okay, that they could now let go of the hurt they’d held on to for goodness knows how long. That I loved them.

Each night since, I’ve continued this practice — quietly, tenderly soothing my legs — and ever since my entire body has been aching, as though it’s detoxing. And to think that, up until this point, I only ever thought a detox consisted of eliminating certain ‘toxic’ food and drinks. I never considered detoxing might also entail the release of long-held toxic thoughts and feelings towards oneself which would result in a similar ‘healing crisis’ to what one might experience during the first few days of a dietary detox.

We spend a lot of time in our heads, particularly those on a spiritual path — abstracting, meditating, theorising, praying, analysing — but not so much time consciously connected to our bodies, reconnecting with our own flesh and bones. We ‘think’ we do — but therein lies the problem. And a mindless, rote-routine of a yoga class won’t cut it. Our bodies carry so much grief, so much unexpressed sadness and repressed hurt and anger, I’m not surprised people turn to alcohol, for example, night after night in order to numb themselves, anaesthetise the pain they’ve long buried; overeat in order to swallow their anxiety, self-loathing, and shame; seek cake-filled sugar-rushes in order to counter their unconscious feelings of not feeling ‘sweet’ enough. The list is endless.

Thing is, we’re of no help to the outer environment (Earth, Nature) if we don’t first consciously and compassionately reconnect with ourselves. Charity begins at home. Many a spiritual teacher has said, You must know and love yourself before you can truly love another.

One final thing: this morning, while lay in bed, somewhere between sleep and waking, I felt my partner reach over and softly stoke my forearm before taking it in his embrace, kissing it, and holding it by his face. He’s never done that before. I guess when you truly begin to love yourself, treat yourself with tenderness and compassion, others follow suit. Put another way, when you change, others around you change. The best bit is, he has no idea of half the Sapphic/Tantric rituals and exercises I practise — and this is only the beginning.

:::

To buy a copy of Running into Myself, visit Amazon UKAmazon US or, better still, order a limited edition signed copy direct from her publisher here (also ships worldwide). Also available to download on Kindle.

Thea’s personal journey is utterly compelling. I couldn’t put her book down. Thea manages to make Greek mythology not only understandable, interesting, and relevant to our lives today, but shows how it can be utilised as a tool for self development. She introduces ideas and ways of thinking that broaden your mind, and lights the way for others to follow.”

— Melinda Messenger (TV Presenter)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

“This is a story that truly reveals its author.
You’ll discover her beliefs, her flaws, her loves, her fears, her mistakes, her drive and her compassion.

And you’ll like her.”

February 23, 2011

Little Voice

Little Voice

The inspiration for this blog comes from one of my favourite and perhaps most influential mentors, American mythologist, Michael Meade. I was first introduced to Meade’s work in spring 2007. My then boyfriend, who lived in Santa Fe (NM), had been to one of his presentations and was so bowled over by him he bought two of his CD recordings on the spot. I still remember him waxing lyrical via a Skype video call about this talk he’d attended, telling me how much I’d love him too. He was right about that.

Later that year I finally got the chance to hear him, in person, when he came back to Santa Fe while I was there. For the two-and-a-half hours he spoke he didn’t waste one single word. I was rapt. The guy was mesmerising. You can keep your Deepak Chopras and your Wayne Dyers — this guy is a truly sublime teacher. And the best of it was his talk was free. In fact, most all of his talks are free. All he asks is you consider making a donation to the not-for-profit organisation he runs called Mosaic Voices. He also encourages folk to buy his talks and books with all profits going to the Mosaic Multicultural Foundation.

Anyway, I went on to buy every single talk/CD he’s ever recorded and now own them all. If I’ve listened to them once, I must’ve listened to them hundreds of times such is the depth, breadth, and richness of information contained within each talk. Although not available to buy in the UK, they are available to order online direct from Mosaic in the US. Postage is very reasonable. One of his most recent releases is a CD entitled ‘The Soul of Change’ in which Meade outlines, well, the Soul of Change.

I do warn you, however, that this isn’t New Age airy-fairy guff. His work is like nothing you’ll have heard before (unless you’re already familiar with the mythopoetic realm). It has depth and beauty and soul. He veers into tribal cultures and storytelling. He plays the drums while recounting traditional folk tales. He shares exquisite poems and breaks down dense, complex psychological concepts, making them more accessible for lay folk.

Late last spring, I had the privilege of attending one of his residential workshops in Santa Cruz, CA. Money very, very well spent. What an incredibly inspiring and nourishing experience. But enough of my enthusing — I’d like to share one of the poems he tells and subsequently explains, at length, on the abovementioned CD The Soul of Change. The poem is entitled ‘Someone, Somewhere’ by William Stafford.

I have an anthology of Williams Stafford’s poems called ‘The Way It Is.’ I’ve bookmarked almost every single poem in the book, such is its sublimity. Unfortunately, however, I can’t seem to track this particular poem down (Someone, Somewhere), so will have to recount it based on Meade’s telling of it on the CD:

Someone, Somewhere

Not you, standing with your host by a window talking,

And not you poised where the light enters and falls to admire what it finds.

We are looking for something different from any of us,

And from those we have always prized.

~

It isn’t accomplishment, not that.

And it isn’t how you look, or sound.

It may be a helpless lock, on a certain way, that no party outside you can change,

And no authority can dictate outside the room of your mind.

~

Maybe you choose, and then time begins to deny.

But far away, what is yours, will begin to come,

And nothing, then, nothing can stop it, between.

For you have turned a corner and become the Self that chooses its own prize.

~

What must you give, people ask, to serve the Divine?

And you don’t have to say, but you do have to know — everything.

:::

I hold this poem close to my heart; particularly in light of recent personal events. Regular readers of this blog may’ve already picked up on my penchant for discussing personal transformation. The reason I ramble on about it so much is because a) I tipped my old 9-5, square-shaped life upside down and walked away from it and b) remain committed to transformation (my own and that of others). I’m also fiercely committed to walking a soul-oriented path. And it’s my ongoing commitment to that path that often makes things difficult, which is why the last stanza of the poem particularly resonates:

“What must you give, people ask, to serve the Divine?

And you don’t have to say, but you do have to know — everything.”

You see, following my inner gradient (talents, passions, interests) is what drives me, compels me, keeps me centred, calm (sometimes), and focused. Although I don’t adhere to any religious dogma or doctrine, neither do I follow any particular spiritual or cultural tradition, I do feel there is something mysterious and ineffable, both immanent and transcendent in which we are ensouled and also contain within us. I don’t care if you call that Nature/God/Divine/Allah/Universe/Deep Mind/Deep Self/Brahman/Yahweh — that’s all finger-pointing-to-the-moon stuff as far as I’m concerned.

This following your heart malarkey, though — damn, some days it can be difficult. When someone you love or respect, for example, whose opinion you value, is trying to get you to see things their way; but all the while a barely perceptible, little voice in the pit of your stomach’s saying, “No. I’m sorry, I can’t do that; No. I’m sorry, I can’t be the person you want me to be; No. I’m sorry, I have to stay committed to what feels right in my Heart of hearts.”

I remember clearly my Reiki teacher asking me before my initial Reiki attunement (August 2004) if I really was serious about what I was about to do, the path I was about to embark on. Let me just say I was very, very naive back then. Because if I had known what would unfold over the coming years, to borrow a line from the movie The Matrix, I’d have told my Reiki teacher to “shove that red pill right up your ass.”

Thing is, though, I wanted change — desperately. My life, back then, was pretty bleak. Put it this way: if I hadn’t changed things and changed them drastically, I doubt I’d be alive today. That little voice, however, gave me something to cling to, kept me afloat, while I drifted through very dark, very ambiguous waters.

Today, that little voice continues to direct me, not unlike Vasilisa’s doll in the fairytale (I recommend Clarissa Pinkola Estés’ brilliant telling and subsequent interpretation of it). That little voice pipes up, tells me to speak up and speak out, even when I’m afraid and don’t want to. That little voice stomps its feet and demands I get bigger, put myself out there, puff out my chest, and fake it ‘til I make it. That little voice tells me to ‘go this way, not that’ even when every fibre of my being is screaming otherwise.

But that little voice also tells me it’s going to be okay. It tells me I’m already sweet enough and don’t need to mindlessly unwrap and scoff another chocolate. It tells me I’m loveable and worth loving. It tells me to hold on and trust. It tells me that, even when the Winds of Change threaten to capsize what oftentimes feels like a rudderless rowing boat in the middle of a storm-ravaged ocean, so long as I keep listening in, keep serving my Heart of hearts (or the Divine as Stafford puts it), I’ll stay on course and, eventually, reach safe harbour.

For as Stafford also says, time does initially deny us — perhaps for weeks, months, or even years — but eventually what is ours begins to come, begins to move towards us. And it does. So long as we stay true to ourselves, nothing can stop it. But, and here’s the kicker, only if we hold fast and listen to the little voice.

This following your heart malarkey — damn, some days it can be difficult.

:::

Thea is author of the inspiring memoir Running into Myself. Buy a copy from Amazon UKAmazon US or, better still, order a limited edition signed copy direct from her publisher here (also ships worldwide).

Thea’s personal journey is utterly compelling. I couldn’t put her book down. Thea manages to make Greek mythology not only understandable, interesting, and relevant to our lives today, but shows how it can be utilised as a tool for self development. She introduces ideas and ways of thinking that broaden your mind, and lights the way for others to follow.”

— Melinda Messenger (TV Presenter)

February 21, 2011

The Miseducation of Thea E

The Miseducation of Thea E


“To be nobody but yourself in a world which is doing its best day and night to make you like everybody else means to fight the hardest battle which any human being can fight and never stop fighting.” — E.E. Cummings

(This interview with Jamie Oliver is what set me off with today’s blog.)

The word ‘education’ stems from the Latin root educere which means to elicit, to bring out, to lead forth. This, however, was not the impression school left me with (the point being exactly that — I felt impressed upon). I felt frustrated — repressed, even — at being forced to study double science, maths, a language (French), a humanity-oriented subject, and two English GCSEs (although, admittedly, I did enjoy English). Sports and the arts were asides and deemed less important. I won’t blame my teachers for this, though, as their hands were equally bound by the System.

Thing was, I was artistically-inclined and loved sports. If those kinds of subjects, however, were considered less important than the aforementioned others (and they were and still are), then what I interpreted the System to be saying — from my adolescent perspective — was my hopes and dreams, the very essence of my being, were also less important. Didn’t matter I began self-studying body language at twelve years old, asked to learn Italian, had an intrigue with philosophy and how the mind worked. Didn’t matter I loved drama, public speaking, building and assembling things (I excelled in Craft, Design, and Technology). No. Because those subjects were considered peripheral, cast in ancillary roles. (Funny, CDT comes in very handy nowadays when I singlehandedly assemble flat-pack furniture.)

The System, you see, decided it’d be a better use of my time to study something ‘proper,’ something more academically-oriented such as science and maths. Thing is, I abhor maths; loathe it. Science too (well, human biology was OK). Whichever way you try and teach me, I’m just not psychically shaped for those subjects. Just as I’m 5’ 8” with an athletic ‘Amazonian’ physique, I will never be a petite 5’ 1” with the derrière of Kylie. I’m shaped the way I am and there ain’t nothing I can do about it.

Yes, I can make adjustments — slim down, bulk up — but the bottom line is (if you’ll forgive the unintended pun) I was dealt a specific set of genetic cards. To deny my fated physical stock and spend the rest of my life railing against and complaining about it would be a tragic and ultimately fruitless waste of time. Better to accept my physical limitations, play the hand I’ve been dealt as creatively as I can, and release the numerous other potentialities inherent within. As mythologist Michael Meade says, “When fully accepted, the destiny will be released from within the limitations of the fate.”

Equally, my psyche is shaped in a particular way. Just because we can’t ‘see’ the psyche, doesn’t mean it isn’t there. We each have unique twists of fate, unique ‘bents’ so to speak: innate, inborn talents, qualities, gifts. So for the System (parents and caregivers too, for that matter) to attempt to contort, standardise, and impress upon me subjects it deemed more ‘fitting’ — subjects it thought would better help me ‘get on’ in this world — was as ludicrous and as much a waste of time as it would be to attempt to change my height from 5’ 8” to 5’ 1”.

At no point did anyone ever ask me throughout my entire time in education, ‘What do you love doing? What do you enjoy doing/reading/watching when you’re not in school?’ Instead, I was given boxes of potential careers to tick, a limited list of subject ‘options’ in third-year secondary school and told to make my choices. Yeah, like I even knew what I wanted for tea that night, let-alone how I’d spend the rest of my life.

All this leaves me wondering where and when the System stopped eliciting/drawing out children’s innate, inborn talents (i.e. educating them) and started trying to standardise them? I mean, what society wants ‘standardised’ children for crying out loud? Thing is, we’re now seeing the ramifications of this all around us: people drifting from job to job looking for somewhere to ‘fit in’ — individuals endowed with endless talents seeking banal, mundane square-shaped existences within which to fit their uniquely-shaped lives; utterly heartbreaking and a woeful waste of talents that our culture ultimately loses out on.

I’ve much more to say on this (my thoughts are vast, rambling, disjointed), but it’s at this point I wish to provide a little inspiration and quote from one of my favourite books by psychologist James Hillman entitled, The Soul’s Code — In Search of Character and Calling:

School failures are common; is this because the child fails school or because school fails the child? Either way, the gap widens between the innate intuitive ability of the child and the formalised tuition of school. As the writer William Saroyan put it: “I resented school, but I never resented learning.” All the while he had trouble learning in school he was reading on his own “nearly every book in the Fresno, California, public library.”

General George S. Patton was dyslexic and was kept back; Winston Churchill, at Harrow, ‘refused to study mathematics, Greek, or Latin and was placed in the lowest form — in what today would be termed the remedial reading class, where slow boys were taught English. His English, however, was not poor; his knowledge of Shakespeare was unusual and self-motivated.’

The composer Edvard Grieg said: “School developed in me nothing but what was evil and left the good untouched.” Thomas Edison said, “I was always at the foot of the class.” Stephen Crane, Eugene O’Neill, William Faulkner, and F. Scott Fitzgerald all failed courses in college. For Ellen Glasgow, author of On Barren Ground and a Pulitzer Prize-winning writer, school was “intolerable.” Willa Cather, Pearl Buck, Isadora Duncan, and Susan B. Anthony also disliked school. Paul Cézanne was rejected by the École des Beaux-Arts in Paris. Marcel Proust’s teacher considered his compositions disorganised, and Emile Zola got a zero in literature, also failing in German language and in rhetoric. Albert Einstein wrote of his middle school (which he attended from age nine and a half): “I preferred to endure all sorts of punishments rather than to learn gabble by rote.” Earlier, at primary school, he was not especially noticeable and was called Biedermeier, meaning a little dull, a little simpler, a little ‘unclever.’ His sister wrote that “he wasn’t even good at arithmetic in the sense of being quick and accurate, though he was reliable and persevering.” Some of these characteristics were due to his slowness of speech.

(I’d just like to interject here by adding that I, too, suffered with a slight stutter during my younger years and was told my writing was particularly infantile and below the acceptable standard for my age. Didn’t stop me going on to win every public speaking competition I entered; become a writer, published author, and student of depth psychology though, eh? And all with no more than two grade Bs in GCSE English literature and language.)

The gap between what is seen by the school and what is felt by the child can work in two ways. Mostly, the child following his or her invisible track is perceived as ‘out of it,’ unteachable, obstinately difficult, even stupid. But pressure can build the other way as well. Diane Arbus, the quirky and extraordinary photographer, said: “The teachers always used to think I was smart and it would torment me because I knew that I was really terribly dumb.” Whether the child is perceived as ‘dumb,’ like Einstein, or ‘smart’ like Arbus, the gap in perception between child and school remains unbridged.

Examinations especially can be a trial. The master bacteriologist Paul Ehrlich had to be excused from school compositions because of his ‘complete ineptness.’ Giacomo Puccini consistently failed exams. Gertrude Stein would not take her final in a class in Harvard. Anton Chekhov refused to study classics, and failed his school exam twice. These failures at school gave him nightmares. “All his life he was to be haunted by dreams of teachers trying to ‘catch him out.’” Pablo Picasso, ‘who could never remember the sequence of the alphabet,’ left at ten ‘because he stubbornly refused to do anything but paint’; even his private tutor gave up on him because Picasso could not learn arithmetic.

Seems I’m in good company then.

:::

Thea is author of the inspiring memoir Running into Myself. Buy a copy from Amazon UKAmazon US or, better still, order a limited edition signed copy direct from her publisher here (also ships worldwide).

Thea’s personal journey is utterly compelling. I couldn’t put her book down. Thea manages to make Greek mythology not only understandable, interesting, and relevant to our lives today, but shows how it can be utilised as a tool for self development. She introduces ideas and ways of thinking that broaden your mind, and lights the way for others to follow.”

— Melinda Messenger (TV Presenter)

February 19, 2011

This Priceless Life

This Priceless Life

A couple of weeks back I shared an excerpt from Robert Sardello’s brilliant book, Freeing the Soul from Fear. At the time I wasn’t quite sure why I did (share it), but since doing so my mind’s been circling the piece, mulling it over. On reflection, there’s so much I want to comment on I almost don’t know where to start; which is why I’ve decided to approach this issue from multiple angles over numerous posts.

Money is a central issue for most everyone living in our modern western world. The dominating myth in our culture is the ‘Economic Myth’ as Sardello so astutely points out (‘myth’ in this particular context is based on the definition of social theorist Betty S. Flowers who defines it as ‘the contexts of imagination that people live within, the concepts that gives meaning to our existence and forms the patterns of our actions in the world’).

The way I see it, most folk allow their intrinsic, innate self-worth to be defined by their salaries, the amount of money in their bank accounts, their collateral (combined value of property/car/business) etc. Hmm… Parochial, myopic, unimaginative (read: soulless) way of living, don’t ya think? How so? Well, in that we allow ourselves to be so narrowly circumscribed by one particular, essentially abstracted manifestation of energy, i.e. money. That’s the Economic Myth. Thing is, I no longer buy into it the way I once did.

Here’s the script: leave school, attend college, go to university, gain a degree, and get a job. Kids and spouse (or the other way around), be saddled with pile of bricks, sorry, buy a house (mortgage), plod towards retirement. The End. (Play golf, take cruises — hey, now we’re living!) There are, of course, numerous other distractions along the way such as fancy holidays/meals out, designer furniture/clothes, particular model of car (must always look cool/keep up with the Joneses); but that’s pretty much it. And so it is we allow ourselves to be defined by our qualifications, credit rating, postcode, and salaries. That’s how we weigh one another up, including prospective partners. Sad, eh?

Doesn’t matter they (partner) are the most miserable, miserly, narcissistic bastard the world has known — just so long as they’re bringing home the bacon on a regular basis, are good with the children; doesn’t matter they have nothing else going for them other than the job they’re married to; doesn’t matter they’re in love with someone else and/or sleeping with other men and/or women every night, so long as they come home to me/keep me in relative comfort.

I’m also suspicious whenever someone feels compelled (particularly unprompted) to tell me how much they earn. Like I give a toss? So you’ve made it now you’re earning £50,000 plus a year? Well, congratulations. However, forgive me for being passé but I’m more interested in you — your passions, your creativity, your gifts, the kind words you shared with a stranger last week, the time you took to do something for a friend in need. I want to know what you’d do if you didn’t have a pot to piss in. I want to know what compels you/makes you tick/keeps you up all night/the career you’d pursue if money were no object; the man/woman you’d be with if you wasn’t so bothered about how you’d potentially be perceived by your peers/family/friends, didn’t care what they had to say, about their opinions. I want to know if you have the bollocks to be true to yourself, come what may.

Yes, money makes life easier but it’s not the whole story; rather, it’s just one of the many forms of currency (or energy) flowing through the culture. You may not have a penny in the bank; have bailiffs knocking at the door; debt collectors ringing your phone off the hook; but that doesn’t prevent you being the most enriched, most talented, most generous individual when it comes to sharing your innate gifts, qualities, and talents. No-one was born impoverished no matter what our culture may try and have us believe.

So although you may earn a wage on which you can barely live/earn ten times what you need; have no money in the bank/have a billion stashed away, remember this — you are worth more than all the money, oil, gold bullion, diamonds, platinum, and freshwater pearls in the world put together — for none of those things have any meaning other than what we put on them. Your one and precious life, what you bring to this world, the way in which you express it, is unrepeatable, is priceless.

So stop allowing your financial worth to define you: you’re worth more than that.

You’re worth more than you’ll ever know.

:::

Thea is author of the inspiring memoir Running into Myself. Buy a copy from Amazon UKAmazon US or, better still, order a limited edition signed copy direct from her publisher here (also ships worldwide).

Thea’s personal journey is utterly compelling. I couldn’t put her book down. Thea manages to make Greek mythology not only understandable, interesting, and relevant to our lives today, but shows how it can be utilised as a tool for self development. She introduces ideas and ways of thinking that broaden your mind, and lights the way for others to follow.”

— Melinda Messenger (TV Presenter)

February 8, 2011

Excerpt from ‘Freeing the Soul from Fear’ by Robert Sardello

Based on recent conversations with friends, I thought I’d share the following excerpt from the book, Freeing the Soul from Fear by archetypal psychologist, Robert Sardello. I’ll allow this piece to stand alone for now and will make reference to it in a future post. Don’t worry if it doesn’t all make sense immediately — the idea is to circle around it several times, gleaning deeper insights with each further reading.

Money Fears


The predominant myth within which we all now live is an economic myth. What we do, how we live, and what we value are largely determined by monetary worth. Money, no doubt, has always had enormous power, but now it overshadows all other values. The fears surrounding money have to do not only with survival but also with the loss of identity associated with not buying into this myth.

The difficulty with the economic myth, as with all myths based on a divisive illusion, is that it leaves out the soul. Statistics, polls, gross national product, inflation rates, production growth, and measures of the global economy form the abstract fabric of this way of organising the world. There is nothing for the soul to relate to, nothing in the outer world that reflects its own mode of reality, which arises through sacred images.

The fear hiding behind all of the vacuous statistical rhetoric of the economic myth is the fear of living without a sacred view of the world. Economics, a word that means ‘care of the household,’ can be a sacred matter; it is not economics per se that constitutes fear, but the sort of economy that depends on the fetishising of material wealth. Still, we must ask, what gives these numbers such power?

The myth of modern economics cannot hold people together as a community, and the world begins fracturing into those who possess and those who are dispossessed. Separation always forms a basis of fears, and in the case of economics, this separation is between those who have socioeconomic power and status and those who do not.

Economic fear also has a great deal to do with how people are treated in the workplace. Corporate culture treats individuals as units. This attitude has infected nearly all of work, whether one happens to work for a corporation or not, and it relies on fear. Here is a description of layoffs in a large corporation:

The way the layoffs were handled was legalistic, efficient, and demeaning. They hired two security guards to make sure things didn’t get out of control. In the meetings where people were told they were being laid off, the vice president read from a prepared statement, the same statement for each employee. Next the employee was escorted to his or her desk where they had little time to pack up, and they were escorted to the door. This was carried out in front of the rest of the company.

The picture reveals the way in which fear has become an unavoidable part of the corporate life. The layoffs described were evidently orchestrated to make the rest of the employees afraid. When corporations treat individuals in this way, soul has no place in daily endeavours. Work is diminished to the banality of keeping the economic machine running efficiently. Our talents and abilities are utilised to accomplish what someone else wants in the world, usually higher profits. The creativeness of our spirit and the depths of our individual soul often have to be relinquished, which results in working in fear. Creativeness and individuality interfere with efficiency and productivity, even though in the long run these qualities contribute most to a lasting, viable business. These days, however, business looks toward short-term gain as the way to perpetuate itself. Receiving a salary is often the only compensation for forgetting who we are.

A first small step — something each of us can do to assure that we do not sell our soul for work — is to perform a daily exercise, to build up the forces of the soul in the context of work that does little to nourish it.

Exercise: Imagine a scene that is typical of your job. You may, for example, picture writing at a computer, or teaching a class, or preparing a legal document — whatever your job consists of on a daily basis. Then, when you have this inner picture and have stabilised it, dissolve the picture into a ball of light. Then let the light re-form into a figure, the figure of a man or a woman, say, or any other form, such as a troll, or an angel, or another sort of being. Then ask this being, “What is your work in the world?” Do not be concerned if you feel you are making up an answer out of your head. Just let it happen. What does this figure say to you? After your conversation is completed, thank this being, and let the figure again dissolve into a ball of light, and then let the light return to your own image of your job. Then open your eyes. Doing this exercise periodically may produce quite interesting results. For example, you may find that while your job may seem the same day in and day out, the soul and spirit dimensions of what you are doing may change frequently. Being present to such change will bring new life to your job. You may also discover that what you think you are doing is something quite different from what your soul and spirit are doing.

In the past, when economic fear based on class distinctions came to dominate the whole of a culture, the situation was ripe for violent revolution. The intention of an exercise such as this is to bring about an inner revolution, the goal of which is to preserve soul. The difficulty in being treated with brutal anonymity lies in the fact that one can become forgetful of being more than a mere function. But if, under the rather dire circumstances prescribed by the economic myth, we keep an inner liveliness of spirit and soul, the possibility of creating a genuine, embracing myth remains open.

The many times I have done this exercise with groups of people has shown me that, indeed, a new myth is attempting to emerge, and that this myth has to do with being of selfless service to others. The reports from people who have done this exercise attest to this. One person, who works as a writer for a popular children’s television series, imagined a scene of himself as sitting at his desk, writing scripts. When this task became an inner figure, he saw an angel who said that his work was to bring courage of heart into the world. The writer was amazed and a bit overwhelmed, and viewed what he had been doing for years in a completely new light. Another person considered her job as answering telephones all day long. When this job became an inner figure, she saw a grandmotherly figure inviting people to dinner, and a group of people sitting around the table having a delicious dinner. When most people do this exercise, they most often experience images having to do with service. The soul apparently, feels most free from fear when it imagines doing something for others. The soul feels the call of the genuine need of others.

While it might seem strange to approach such overwhelming economic fears by suggesting we exercise the imagination, the goal is not to solve the problem of money and its power in our culture. It is simply to provide a way for the soul to keep from getting lost and forgotten in the presence of fears surrounding money. If we can keep soul connected with our jobs, our re-imagined work life will go a long way to alleviate financial fears.

Copyright © 1999 Robert Sardello

:::

Thea is author of the inspiring memoir Running into Myself. Buy a copy from Amazon UKAmazon US or, better still, order a limited edition signed copy direct from her publisher here (also ships worldwide).

Thea’s personal journey is utterly compelling. I couldn’t put her book down. Thea manages to make Greek mythology not only understandable, interesting, and relevant to our lives today, but shows how it can be utilised as a tool for self development. She introduces ideas and ways of thinking that broaden your mind, and lights the way for others to follow.”

— Melinda Messenger (TV Presenter)

June 20, 2010

Running into Myself: A Journey Through the Soul of the Feat – Preface

The following excerpt is taken from Urban Deva founder, Thea Euryphaessa’s recently released memoir Running into Myself: A Journey Through the Soul of the Feat. If you’re a fan of Eat Pray LoveElizabeth Gilbert’s international best-seller and soon-to-be motion picture starring Julia Roberts, or Clarissa Pinkola Estés’ now classic New York Times best-seller Women Who Run with the Wolves, we recommend this incredible true story of one woman’s rite of passage from girl- to womanhood.

Limited edition signed copies of the book are available to buy direct from the publisher here (also ships overseas). The book is also available in the United States at Amazon.com.

Preface (Return with the Elixir)

I am telling myself the story of my life, stranger than song or fiction.

- Paddy McAloon, I Trawl the Megahertz


This book is an attempt to disentangle my destiny from my fate. It’s about a long-overdue, threshold-crossing to womanhood. And it marks The Return – the third and final stage of my initiation, fulfilling an old agreement made with my soul. It’s not a book about running. I run, yes, but that’s not the point of this book. In fact, there is no particular ‘point.’ Points seem contrived, convenient and conclusive. And my journey has been anything but.

Oftentimes the only way to make sense of a life and give it meaning is to share it within the context of a story. Some are supremely gifted at this. They have a knack, make it look easy. I wish this had been so for me. Composing this book has been a painstaking process, demanding all my mental and emotional resources.

I enjoy writing. After dancing, it’s my most natural means of self-expression. But it’s a means to an end. My focus is to nurture the soul and live an authentic life. To help do this I write – not to be creative, but to express energy. Writing helps mirror myself to myself; it provides a container in which the transformative process can unfold, a way to track and trace the soul’s meanderings.

Once thoughts, images and intuitions are on the page, I sort through them, hold them up to the light for reflection, turn them over in my mind. Like dreams, they don’t always make sense – at least not immediately. They can be vague, indecisive and contrary. I also find the flat, one-dimensional nature of words frustrating. They restrict and rigidify. They’re inadequate at expressing the fullness and ambiguity of a human life. But they intrigue and enchant me all the same. And so I keep writing.

Further challenges involve my perfectionist tendencies. I like everything just so. I much prefer writing essays. That way, I can retain absolute control over a piece, stay on point. So to make the leap to the rambling expanse of a book exposes my weaknesses and shortcomings as a writer. In composing this book I’ve had to accept my work can never be perfect. I often lose my way, veer off track – a humbling process mirroring the soul’s journey as it grows down and takes root within the limitations of a human life.

Then there are those whose fate has entwined with mine. There’s an old saying in alchemy: As Without, So Within. I believe those with whom we interact are outer reflections of an inner psychic process. Because of this emotional entanglement, I know my perspective will be distorted. To compensate, I try to be as honest as possible about my version of events. If I’ve been petulant, infantile or provoking, I’ll say so. Sometimes emotions may get the better of me and I’ll speculate about others’ behavioural patterns and traits. But for the most part, I rein it in.

So this book is a story within stories, a life within Life. Life that does not run in an orderly, linear fashion, but spirals, backtracks, spins off at tangents and raises more questions than it answers. Not everything will be boxed off and neatly concluded by the end of the book. Along the way I share pivotal moments, hopes and dreams, setbacks and journal entries. There are mythological ideas, psychological theories and spiritual concepts. These may not always make sense. As the quote above says, I’m telling myself the story of my life. So if I labour a point or circle an issue, it’s more a frustrated attempt to clarify my soul’s nebulous, inarticulate messages, to ascertain a pattern, extricate meaning.

This book also reflects the organic process of a life’s unfolding and becoming. Intuition tells me this is a book within books, a springboard – an opportunity to share, and discuss. Not all of my thoughts and ideas are carved in stone. Many are ephemeral. But I don’t have time to wait until they’re fully formed – my soul demands expression now.

In tribal cultures, when an initiate returns home after a quest they’re expected to share their experiences. That’s because the lessons learnt aren’t strictly for the individual but for the benefit of the group. As the initiate tells their story, the story takes on a life of its own, its essence revealed. People don’t think of stories as having souls. But the soul manifests as the kinks and knotty imperfections – the seeming irregularities that perplex so many. In our ‘plastic fantastic.’ high-speed modern culture, we’ve lost touch with the soul. We’re uncomfortable with it. In many cases we’re afraid of it. And so we rampantly edit, refine and process until nothing remains but a soulless shell. But grainy mishaps highlight our humanness. They add warmth, remind us of our imperfection. They expose the vulnerability involved in the process of creativity, the struggle of a complicated, multifaceted soul seeking expression.

My decision to self-publish honours the soul’s wrinkles and knotty irregularities. I didn’t want the book’s essence to be extracted in the centrifuge of profit-driven publishing  or shoe-horned into an unnatural shape, its soul contaminated and diluted by the uninitiated opinions of others. I wasn’t willing to compromise. As the song says:

I’ll go it alone, that’s how it must be

I can’t be right for somebody else

If I’m not right for me

I gotta  be free, I’ve just gotta be free

Daring to try, to do it or die

I’ve gotta be me.

-Walter Marks, I’ve Gotta Be Me

And so I follow my soul as it sets out its stall in the early chapters. I watch as it introduces itself and reiterates statements time and again before gradually relaxing into the story. Sometimes I cringe at its audacious, naive, bombastic nature. I ponder its uptight, defensive, secretive tendencies. Other times I grow bored with its incessant ramblings, wonder where it’s going. But all the while I stay with it, try to honour its paradoxical, elusive essence as best I can.

So I encourage the reader to relax and not to get too hung up or too bogged down in my mercurial meanderings. As psychologist Carl Jung says in his memoir Memories, Dreams, Reflections, ‘I can only make direct statements, only “tell stories.” Whether or not the stories are “true” is not the problem. The only question is whether what I tell is my fable, my truth.’

(Thea Euryphaessa is hereby identified as the author of this work in accordance with Section 77 of the Copyright, Designs and Patent Act 1988.)

Powered by WordPress