Join Urban Deva on Facebook Join Urban Deva on Facebook

July 15, 2011

The Tree of Life — Movie Review

The Tree of Life (12A)

Thea Euryphaessa reviews Terrence Malick’s Palme d’Or winner, The Tree of Life


“Unless you are educated in metaphor, you are not safe to be let loose in the world.” — Robert Frost

Terrence Malick’s movies have a history of testing my patience and this one was no different. It was only the sheer beauty of the cinematography in ‘The Thin Red Line’ and the achingly gorgeous Jim Caviezel in the lead role that stopped me walking out after the first half hour. This time, however, where I persevered, others gave up the ghost and left. It was the unashamedly Kubrickian and oft baffling imagery of the universe, including numerous shots of nebulae and big bangs, followed by dinosaurs apparently toying with the idea of morality that pushed several members of the audience over the edge — a scene which, in my opinion, rambled on a tad too long.

But, then, this is a director who’s grappling with the issue of Life with a capital ‘L’. In fact, I wouldn’t be surprised if Malick has studied Carl Jung’s ‘Answer to Job’ which addresses the moral, mythological, and psychological implications of Job’s relationship with God; particularly as the movie opens with a quote from The Book of Job:

“Where were you when I laid the foundation of the earth? When the morning stars sang together, and all the sons of God shouted for joy?” (38:4,7)

And it’s this quote, together with the title itself, which underscores the entire film. Thing is, as a student of depth psychology, I’m familiar with Jung’s discourse of Job. I’m also familiar with metaphor and archetypal symbolism — which is a good job really, as Malick spends much of this film employing metaphors as a means of amplifying his core message.

If you like your movies to be coherent, with a linear narrative that have a beginning, a middle, and an end, steer well clear of this offering. Why? Because it spirals, backtracks, and seems to do whatever the hell it pleases. This is a movie that speaks to the circuitous, non-linear nature of the psyche, bypassing the rational, logical conscious mind. Like any good art, it’s about standing back and absorbing it as a whole while allowing the themes to wash over you. Whether or not it succeeds in making itself ‘transparent to the transcendent’ is another matter — but it’s not for lack of trying.

The movie focuses on a middle-aged Jack O’Brien (Sean Penn), reflecting back on his childhood and growing up with his brothers in 1950s Texas, with his authoritarian father, Mr O’Brien (Brad Pitt) and his ethereal, angelic mother, Mrs O’Brien (Jessica Chastain). The movie opens with Mrs O’Brien receiving a telegram that one of her teenage sons has died, followed immediately by Mr O’Brien also receiving the news. When a tree is planted outside Jack’s place of work, it acts as the springboard for his childhood reminiscence. From then on, the movie flits back and forth between the present day and his childhood memories.

We also learn early on, thanks to whispered voiceovers, that human beings are essentially torn between grace (divinity) and nature (ego will), with Mr O’Brien personifying the demanding, brusque nature of will and Mrs O’Brien the softer, ‘naive’ face of grace (in Mr O’Brien’s opinion). Their children are caught between these two polarised perspectives, while ongoing voiceovers provided by family members, past and present, pose various existential questions which the issues of grief and bereavement tend to throw into sharp relief.

Malick deftly touches on a wide range of psychological issues including a beautifully handled depiction of the Oedipal complex (watch for when Jack’s character breaks into a house, steals a nightdress, followed by him watching his mother waft around in her nightdress and then wanting to kill his father). His moments of brilliance for me, however, are when he opts to employ a symbol rather than narrative. This is a director who believes his audience to be far more intelligent than most and doesn’t believe they need everything spelled out to them in order to ensure understanding. His simple use of a bridge to consolidate Mrs O’Brien’s statement in the final scene is a stroke of understated genius.

I’m not going to wax lyrical and say this movie’s a masterpiece — it veers unnecessarily into pompous and grandiose territory on more than one occasion — but it’s certainly visionary, evocative, and thoughtful. Few directors would have the guts to bring such existential subjects to the big screen in an epic, unapologetic manner. And it’s for this reason alone I recommend you suspend your critical disbelief for a couple of hours and allow yourself to be immersed in the themes this movie so engagingly and poetically presents.

7.5/10

:::

To buy a copy of Running into Myself, visit Amazon UKAmazon US or, better still, order a limited edition signed copy direct from her publisher here (also ships worldwide). Also available to download on Kindle.

Thea’s personal journey is utterly compelling. I couldn’t put her book down. Thea manages to make Greek mythology not only understandable, interesting, and relevant to our lives today, but shows how it can be utilised as a tool for self development. She introduces ideas and ways of thinking that broaden your mind, and lights the way for others to follow.”

— Melinda Messenger (TV Presenter)

“This is a story that truly reveals its author. You’ll discover her beliefs, her flaws, her loves, her fears, her mistakes, her drive and her compassion.

And you’ll like her.”

— Rowena Forbes (Journalist)

July 14, 2011

Sacrifice of Innocence

Sacrifice of Innocence


“It’s not your job to like me — it’s mine.” — Byron Katie

This blog continues on from my previous post ‘The Rise of the Green-Eyed Monster’ which I wrote out ‘white hot’ so to speak. Thing with me, is, I like to get my thoughts and feelings out on paper (or on the screen) first, and then sit back and reflect on what I’ve said. It’s a process I call ‘seed sorting’.

What I’ve decided to do with this post, however, is share an excerpt from one of my favourite books ‘The Feminine in Fairy Tales’ by Marie-Louise von Franz. I was drawn to this book after writing my previous post and opened it at just the right place. I’ve already read it a couple of times, but it’s one of those books which is chock-full of wise insights and astute psychological observations.

I also found myself listening to one of Michael Meade’s lectures again and it was his words, too, that have also helped me make sense of the transition/growth I’m currently experiencing. I’ll speak more about what he had to say in my next blog but, suffice to say, it was his words ‘sacrifice of innocence’ which jumped out at me and helped me spot my own idealistic and often self-righteous nature (aka my shadow) regards certain issues.

For now though here’s the excerpt from ‘The Feminine in Fairytales’ which I’ll allow to stand on its own here, and comment on further in my next piece:

[This piece is a commentary of the fairytale ‘Vasilisa the Beautiful’ (similar archetypal motif to Cinderella and Psyche’s predicament in Apuleius’ tale, ‘Amor and Psyche’), the full version of which can be read here.]

The merchant then marries the witch with the two daughters, three jealous bitches who persecute the girl. This is an archetypal motif: where the pearl is, there is also the dragon, and vice versa. They are never separate. Frequently, just after the first intuitive realisation of the Self, the powers of desolation and darkness break in. A terrible slaughtering always take place at the same time as the birth of the hero, as for instance the killing of the innocents at Bethlehem when Christ was born. Some persecuting power starts at once to blot out the inner germ. Outwardly, it is often that the innermost kernel of the human being has an actually irritating effect upon outer surroundings. Realisation of the Self when in statu nascendi, when only a hunch, makes a person unadapted and difficult for those around, for it disturbs the unconscious instinctive order. Jung often said that it is as if a flock of sheep resented it bitterly that one sheep wanted to walk by itself.

In Germany, group psychology experiments have been made with hens and other birds. Hens and crows, for instance, observe a certain pecking order. There is the rooster, and his first wife, who has her first rights. The others have special rank in the order in which they may eat and build their nests. Most animals, and also apes, have an order which one calls the alpha, beta, gamma order. Some psychologists say that in a human group, or in a crowd, people also try to peck each other. The alpha hen is generally the most disgusting and pushy person, and the best in I.Q. are the gamma and delta hens. Clearly, wherever people form a group, there is this interplay of unconscious balance; however, if any one person gets just an idea of the Self, he falls out of the group, and the balance has to be re-established. Now that one factor is out, the others feel the gap and are naturally angry and try and force the miscreant to the former unconscious level. If you analyse one member of the family, usually the whole family begins to wobble and get upset. Insofar as we are herd animals, we have within ourselves that essential conflict between the inertia which wants to remain in the flock, and the disturbing factor, the possibility of individuation. A woman who gets the first hunch of the Self is immediately attacked, not only by the stepmother outside, but from within, by the inner stepmother, that is, the inertia of the old collective pattern of femininity, that regressive inertia which always pulls one back to do the thing in the least painful way. As in many other Cinderella stories, the stepsisters are characterised as lazy, and the heroine has to do tremendously hard work, such as separating grains, which entails a superhuman effort. There is the conflict between that which calls upon you to make the superhuman effort and the desire to follow the old pattern.

(My next blog will most likely be on my return from my holiday, week commencing 1 August: I’m going off-grid to an eco retreat beneath starry skies in deepest, darkest Spain. Hasta luego!)

:::

To buy a copy of Running into Myself, visit Amazon UKAmazon US or, better still, order a limited edition signed copy direct from her publisher here (also ships worldwide). Also available to download on Kindle.

Thea’s personal journey is utterly compelling. I couldn’t put her book down. Thea manages to make Greek mythology not only understandable, interesting, and relevant to our lives today, but shows how it can be utilised as a tool for self development. She introduces ideas and ways of thinking that broaden your mind, and lights the way for others to follow.”

— Melinda Messenger (TV Presenter)

“This is a story that truly reveals its author. You’ll discover her beliefs, her flaws, her loves, her fears, her mistakes, her drive and her compassion.

And you’ll like her.”

— Rowena Forbes (Journalist)

April 5, 2011

The Greatest Love Of All

Before I continue, I’d like to apologise for the disjointed nature of this blog. I have things I want to record, remember. My next book is constellating and the thoughts shared here will have a part to play in it.

The Greatest Love Of All

A couple of weeks ago, while walking through Manchester city centre, I was stopped dead in my tracks by the above advert emblazoned across a billboard. My mouth gaped open. Is that the ideal our society is now peddling as womanhood?

Now, images like this are nothing new in this day and age. What galled me about this particular advert, however, was its cringe-worthy attempt at depicting an alluring, mysterious form of women’s sexuality. No disrespect to the model but she looks like a pre-pubescent girl who’s just raided mummy’s make-up case and is now parading about in her nightie.

I was raised in a house where images of the naked female form adorned most every wall: images by Toulouse-Lautrec, Schiele, and Picasso to name but a few. No-one, in my not-so-humble opinion, got closer to capturing the dark alluring underworld of female sexuality quite like Toulouse-Lautrec’s late 19th century Parisian depictions — life splayed open in all its indecent and decadent glory.

Growing up, I was somewhat shielded from our culture’s parochial, myopic ideas of female beauty by my parents’ interests. From mum I inherit my studious love for words and books, and from my aunt I inherited my passion for the female form, art in all its guises, and interior design — beauty, beauty, beauty. My aunt also used to play George Benson’s song The Greatest Love Of All over and over — she later told me she played it for me in the hope it might sink  into my unconscious. They never bought fashion glossies or gossip magazines into the house, preferring instead Ideal Homes, Private Eye, The Economist, and The Manchester Guardian newspaper (RIP).

Anyway, as some of you know, I recently attended a women’s only Tantra workshop. Life-changing stuff. A month on and I’m still reeling from it. Complementing perfectly my ongoing studies into archetypal psychology (which itself is derived from Jung’s Analytical Psychology), it balances head with body; the intellect with the experiential. So when I saw the above advert, it immediately called to mind the following excerpt from a book I recently read by Ginette Paris entitled Pagan Meditations:

Insisting on the beauty of Aphrodite, as one inevitably does, we risk forgetting that her mysteries are concerned with the whole body and not only with the eye. The woman who has the qualities of Aphrodite knows how to move, breathe, and vibrate, and is capable of generating as well as receiving high-intensity sexual energy.

Some beautiful women give the impression that they are inhabited by Aphrodite’s qualities. Their seductive appearance which promises of pleasure, however, leads to deception each time this promise is not kept by the body.

But when competence at bodily love prevails over good looks, certain women, even though unsightly, may exert upon their lovers an extraordinary attraction.

Several years ago, while travelling in Morocco, I went to see two performances of belly dancing in the same evening. The first took place in an American hotel, where I had gone to meet some friends. The publicity insisted upon the splendid figure of the dancer: she wore a light veil embroidered with pearls and was indeed beautiful. She moved little, but with grace. Her gestures were those of the belly-dance, but perhaps because of the air-conditioning, or her bleached blonde hair, the whole thing appeared to be insipid and deceptive [my italics].

Later in the evening, in the public square of the old town, I watched a young Berber woman dancing. She was certainly very poor and had no chance of penetrating show-business; her figure was too heavy, and her features hard and imperfect. Although dressed to the neck in a poor cotton dress, and without any artifice of scenery, she kept the public under the spell of her dance with the brusque movements of her hips, her rhythmic cries, her vigour, and her delighted eyes. All her muscles, all her gestures expressed what is most sexual within us. Each movement proceeded from her belly as if from the centre of herself. I have never since seen a more erotic dance.

The first dancer, although beautiful and graceful, seemed to imitate the movements of love, but she could not radiate with Aphrodite’s energy. It was only upon seeing the ‘real’ belly dancing that I knew the first was only a pastiche.

Insipid and deceptive. Bingo. And that’s exactly the perspective those of us on the Sapphic or Tantric path view posters such as the above. Thing is, it takes a hell of a lot of (conscious) physical and psychological work to break free from the myriad forms of body fascism that so insidiously grip our modern western culture, affecting the lives of both men and women.

Just last Saturday night, I inadvertently ended up doing a ritual which turned out to be quite profound. With my boyfriend out for the night, I turned our bathroom into a temple fit for a modern-day goddess. With dozens of fragrant candles dotted about the place, I scattered the entire bathroom floor with hot-pink rose petals, filled the bath with fragrant rose oil, and put some beautiful music on. I then spent the next few hours mindfully caring for and befriending my body. But it’s what happened at the end which most surprised me.

After drying off I slowly began to massage my favourite oil into my calves and thighs, while saying the following which is adapted from an exercise in Margot Anand’s brilliant book The Art of Everyday Ecstasy — The Seven Tantric Keys for Bringing Passion, Spirit, and Joy into Every Part of Your Life:

Thank you (legs) for carrying my weight in the world and supporting my life. Thank you (knees) for your unique mobility. Without you I could not walk, run, dance, do Pilates or Yin yoga, and a thousand other joys. Thank you (thighs) for your strength, for your willingness to be pillars of support to connect my pelvis to my legs. You are a great help to me. I’m sorry I’ve beat up on you every day with scorn and self-loathing because I didn’t believe you were sylph-like and slinky enough…

I then spent the next ten or fifteen minutes, quietly, tenderly massaging the oil into my thighs. As I massaged they began to feel sore and somewhat bruised — as though they were releasing long repressed pain and ancient hurt. If a body part could cry — and I believe they do — then my thighs did just that. And, as they did, I soothed and smoothed them lovingly as though holding a child or loved one who was in pain. For the first time in my life, I held and stroked them with love — unconditional love and absolute acceptance for how they were right now; not how they could be sometime in the future, but right now, in this moment. I told them it was okay, that they could now let go of the hurt they’d held on to for goodness knows how long. That I loved them.

Each night since, I’ve continued this practice — quietly, tenderly soothing my legs — and ever since my entire body has been aching, as though it’s detoxing. And to think that, up until this point, I only ever thought a detox consisted of eliminating certain ‘toxic’ food and drinks. I never considered detoxing might also entail the release of long-held toxic thoughts and feelings towards oneself which would result in a similar ‘healing crisis’ to what one might experience during the first few days of a dietary detox.

We spend a lot of time in our heads, particularly those on a spiritual path — abstracting, meditating, theorising, praying, analysing — but not so much time consciously connected to our bodies, reconnecting with our own flesh and bones. We ‘think’ we do — but therein lies the problem. And a mindless, rote-routine of a yoga class won’t cut it. Our bodies carry so much grief, so much unexpressed sadness and repressed hurt and anger, I’m not surprised people turn to alcohol, for example, night after night in order to numb themselves, anaesthetise the pain they’ve long buried; overeat in order to swallow their anxiety, self-loathing, and shame; seek cake-filled sugar-rushes in order to counter their unconscious feelings of not feeling ‘sweet’ enough. The list is endless.

Thing is, we’re of no help to the outer environment (Earth, Nature) if we don’t first consciously and compassionately reconnect with ourselves. Charity begins at home. Many a spiritual teacher has said, You must know and love yourself before you can truly love another.

One final thing: this morning, while lay in bed, somewhere between sleep and waking, I felt my partner reach over and softly stoke my forearm before taking it in his embrace, kissing it, and holding it by his face. He’s never done that before. I guess when you truly begin to love yourself, treat yourself with tenderness and compassion, others follow suit. Put another way, when you change, others around you change. The best bit is, he has no idea of half the Sapphic/Tantric rituals and exercises I practise — and this is only the beginning.

:::

To buy a copy of Running into Myself, visit Amazon UKAmazon US or, better still, order a limited edition signed copy direct from her publisher here (also ships worldwide). Also available to download on Kindle.

Thea’s personal journey is utterly compelling. I couldn’t put her book down. Thea manages to make Greek mythology not only understandable, interesting, and relevant to our lives today, but shows how it can be utilised as a tool for self development. She introduces ideas and ways of thinking that broaden your mind, and lights the way for others to follow.”

— Melinda Messenger (TV Presenter)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

“This is a story that truly reveals its author.
You’ll discover her beliefs, her flaws, her loves, her fears, her mistakes, her drive and her compassion.

And you’ll like her.”

June 20, 2010

Running into Myself: A Journey Through the Soul of the Feat – Preface

The following excerpt is taken from Urban Deva founder, Thea Euryphaessa’s recently released memoir Running into Myself: A Journey Through the Soul of the Feat. If you’re a fan of Eat Pray LoveElizabeth Gilbert’s international best-seller and soon-to-be motion picture starring Julia Roberts, or Clarissa Pinkola Estés’ now classic New York Times best-seller Women Who Run with the Wolves, we recommend this incredible true story of one woman’s rite of passage from girl- to womanhood.

Limited edition signed copies of the book are available to buy direct from the publisher here (also ships overseas). The book is also available in the United States at Amazon.com.

Preface (Return with the Elixir)

I am telling myself the story of my life, stranger than song or fiction.

- Paddy McAloon, I Trawl the Megahertz


This book is an attempt to disentangle my destiny from my fate. It’s about a long-overdue, threshold-crossing to womanhood. And it marks The Return – the third and final stage of my initiation, fulfilling an old agreement made with my soul. It’s not a book about running. I run, yes, but that’s not the point of this book. In fact, there is no particular ‘point.’ Points seem contrived, convenient and conclusive. And my journey has been anything but.

Oftentimes the only way to make sense of a life and give it meaning is to share it within the context of a story. Some are supremely gifted at this. They have a knack, make it look easy. I wish this had been so for me. Composing this book has been a painstaking process, demanding all my mental and emotional resources.

I enjoy writing. After dancing, it’s my most natural means of self-expression. But it’s a means to an end. My focus is to nurture the soul and live an authentic life. To help do this I write – not to be creative, but to express energy. Writing helps mirror myself to myself; it provides a container in which the transformative process can unfold, a way to track and trace the soul’s meanderings.

Once thoughts, images and intuitions are on the page, I sort through them, hold them up to the light for reflection, turn them over in my mind. Like dreams, they don’t always make sense – at least not immediately. They can be vague, indecisive and contrary. I also find the flat, one-dimensional nature of words frustrating. They restrict and rigidify. They’re inadequate at expressing the fullness and ambiguity of a human life. But they intrigue and enchant me all the same. And so I keep writing.

Further challenges involve my perfectionist tendencies. I like everything just so. I much prefer writing essays. That way, I can retain absolute control over a piece, stay on point. So to make the leap to the rambling expanse of a book exposes my weaknesses and shortcomings as a writer. In composing this book I’ve had to accept my work can never be perfect. I often lose my way, veer off track – a humbling process mirroring the soul’s journey as it grows down and takes root within the limitations of a human life.

Then there are those whose fate has entwined with mine. There’s an old saying in alchemy: As Without, So Within. I believe those with whom we interact are outer reflections of an inner psychic process. Because of this emotional entanglement, I know my perspective will be distorted. To compensate, I try to be as honest as possible about my version of events. If I’ve been petulant, infantile or provoking, I’ll say so. Sometimes emotions may get the better of me and I’ll speculate about others’ behavioural patterns and traits. But for the most part, I rein it in.

So this book is a story within stories, a life within Life. Life that does not run in an orderly, linear fashion, but spirals, backtracks, spins off at tangents and raises more questions than it answers. Not everything will be boxed off and neatly concluded by the end of the book. Along the way I share pivotal moments, hopes and dreams, setbacks and journal entries. There are mythological ideas, psychological theories and spiritual concepts. These may not always make sense. As the quote above says, I’m telling myself the story of my life. So if I labour a point or circle an issue, it’s more a frustrated attempt to clarify my soul’s nebulous, inarticulate messages, to ascertain a pattern, extricate meaning.

This book also reflects the organic process of a life’s unfolding and becoming. Intuition tells me this is a book within books, a springboard – an opportunity to share, and discuss. Not all of my thoughts and ideas are carved in stone. Many are ephemeral. But I don’t have time to wait until they’re fully formed – my soul demands expression now.

In tribal cultures, when an initiate returns home after a quest they’re expected to share their experiences. That’s because the lessons learnt aren’t strictly for the individual but for the benefit of the group. As the initiate tells their story, the story takes on a life of its own, its essence revealed. People don’t think of stories as having souls. But the soul manifests as the kinks and knotty imperfections – the seeming irregularities that perplex so many. In our ‘plastic fantastic.’ high-speed modern culture, we’ve lost touch with the soul. We’re uncomfortable with it. In many cases we’re afraid of it. And so we rampantly edit, refine and process until nothing remains but a soulless shell. But grainy mishaps highlight our humanness. They add warmth, remind us of our imperfection. They expose the vulnerability involved in the process of creativity, the struggle of a complicated, multifaceted soul seeking expression.

My decision to self-publish honours the soul’s wrinkles and knotty irregularities. I didn’t want the book’s essence to be extracted in the centrifuge of profit-driven publishing  or shoe-horned into an unnatural shape, its soul contaminated and diluted by the uninitiated opinions of others. I wasn’t willing to compromise. As the song says:

I’ll go it alone, that’s how it must be

I can’t be right for somebody else

If I’m not right for me

I gotta  be free, I’ve just gotta be free

Daring to try, to do it or die

I’ve gotta be me.

-Walter Marks, I’ve Gotta Be Me

And so I follow my soul as it sets out its stall in the early chapters. I watch as it introduces itself and reiterates statements time and again before gradually relaxing into the story. Sometimes I cringe at its audacious, naive, bombastic nature. I ponder its uptight, defensive, secretive tendencies. Other times I grow bored with its incessant ramblings, wonder where it’s going. But all the while I stay with it, try to honour its paradoxical, elusive essence as best I can.

So I encourage the reader to relax and not to get too hung up or too bogged down in my mercurial meanderings. As psychologist Carl Jung says in his memoir Memories, Dreams, Reflections, ‘I can only make direct statements, only “tell stories.” Whether or not the stories are “true” is not the problem. The only question is whether what I tell is my fable, my truth.’

(Thea Euryphaessa is hereby identified as the author of this work in accordance with Section 77 of the Copyright, Designs and Patent Act 1988.)

Powered by WordPress